is not very helpful to describe natural laws using a multitude of different
and, at least in part, still income-prehensible paradigms. Even a purely
mathematical commentary and interpretation of such events is difficult and
sometimes even misleading.
physics operation feels this problem and therefore seeks the famous Theory of
Everything in various ways. Terms like String and Bran accompany this path and
thus move even further away from a meaningful and comprehensible idea. Despite
many efforts, complex mathematical descriptions, such as those known from the
theory of relativity or the quantum world, do not really fit together somehow,
and therefore confuse even more.
spaces, a variety of particles (particle zoo) that may race around at the speed
of light, preferably without any loss of energy or energy requirement, forever
and ever, temporary virtual particles, if necessary with a rest mass of zero.
etc., are therefore not very convincing.
the idea of a uniform material causality, which is at least indirectly
measurable and thus comprehensible through different amounts of a form of
energy, is more sympathetic in such a diversity. A first step towards such a
solution is therefore a continuous, all-formulating and descriptive paradigm,
which may not always be sufficiently vivid, but should nevertheless be
intellectually comprehensible and provable.
results of such analyses and considerations may seem spectacular, but it is
obvious that material and energetic reactions are a answer of matter or its
components to influences and lead to the observable manifestations.
a few unconventional thoughts on the Topic